Latest News

He's Doohan it for road safety

Oct 31, 2009

FORMER world motorcycle champion Mick Doohan is the new face of safe riding in South Australia.

Mr Doohan said a graphic new TV commercial, which superimposes everyday objects like phone boxes and trees on to a motorcycle track, should leave no doubt about the consequences of a street crash.

View full article here

See video here

Two wheels wins in crowded Sydney

Oct 28, 2009

Rising fuel costs, congestion, no parking, poor public transport and environmental concerns are driving up motorcycle use.

Yet, transport policy lags far behind and has failed to create equity for this growing group of road users.

Sydney Council’s move to free motorcycle parking one year ago has been widely applauded and embraced. Yet, the State Government has failed to create road toll and registration equity, and has inadequately invested in safety campaigns, according to the Motorcycle Council of NSW.

“The total spend on safety campaigns since 2003 has been less than four million,’’ Guy Stanford of the Motorcycle Council of NSW said. “But it makes economic sense to move to a scooter or small bike. The average car journey carries 1.1 people, rolling a tonne-and-a-half to shift just one person.

“Motorcycles are less than 200kg. A lot of people are shifting to motorcycles for convenience, initially because of the overstretched public transport system. But as petrol prices start to bite, it makes economic sense. There has been a big growth in 250cc bikes.’’

View full article here

Motorcycle Buyers Encourage to Take Advantage of Economic Incentives

Oct 12, 2009

Figures released by the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) show 82,601 motorcycles, scooters and all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) were sold in the nine months to September – a 14.4 per cent decline compared to the same period in 2008.

“The motorcycle market has faced a period of challenging economic circumstances and although down on the record highs of last year has remained resilient,” FCAI Chief Executive Andrew McKellar said.

View full article here

Road Rules

The Australian Road Rules were introduced in 1999 to replace various different State road rules with a single uniform set for all of Australia.

A great idea, but in practice it has problems. Consultation is done badly, ignoring anything that does not agree with the prejudices and agenda of some bully members of the ARRMG Committee.

Closing off submission dates early, using anecdotes instead of evidence or simply demonstrating ignorance of the issue have been demonstrated in the past twelve months.

It also appears that the ARRMG just like to fiddle with the Rules for the sake of justifying themselves.

However, they do get some Rule changes right.

Road Rules Process

The Australian Road Rules Maintenance Group (ARRMG) provides advice to the National Transport Commission on Road Rules.

The NTC, as "manager", but not member of the ARRMG, submits changes to the Australian Transport Council, which includes the Minister of every State and Territory If voted upon and accepted by ATC, these changes will become law in every State and Territory

More on ATC, Click here

Methodology of Rules Changes

The Australian Road Rules were approved by Australian Transport Council in January 1999 and published by the National Road Transport Commission in October 1999 in a version which incorporated amendments approved by the Australian Transport Council on 30 June 1999 and 11 October 1999.

When approving the principle Rules in January 1999, the Australian Transport Council also approved a strategy for maintaining the Rules, which included the establishment of a maintenance group, Australian Road Rules Maintenance Group (ARRMG) to amend the Rules to ensure their ongoing relevance.

Amendment packages are developed by the ARRMG which is convened by the National Transport Commission (formerly the National Road Transport Commission) and comprises representatives from State and Territory Transport Agencies and Department of Transport and Regional Services (Commonwealth), Police, and Standards Australia.

An abridged methodology is as follows:

  • the National Transport Commission calls for discussion issues and proposals for change from the ARRMG
  • issues are discussed and proposals put forward for change
  • a Regulatory Impact Statement and draft amendments are developed and agreed to by the ARRMG
  • the Regulatory Impact Statement and draft amendments are release for public comment/consultation (6 week period)
  • all comments received either to the National Transport Commission or individual jurisdictions are considered by the ARRMG
  • modifications are made to the Regulatory Impact Statement and the draft amendments as required and they are then forwarded to the Transport Agencies Chief Executives for endorsement.
  • any issues the Transport Agencies Chief Executives have are addressed and their endorsement sought.
  • the Regulatory Impact Statement and draft amendments are then forwarded to the Australian Transport Council for approval.

During the public comment/consultation phase jurisdictions are urged/encouraged to consult as widely as possible with their stakeholders. Documents are also placed on the National Transport Commission’s web site as well as being forwarded to any National representative body.

Unfortunately, this process doesn't work very at all. There are agendas at work to avoid actual consultation and in ignorance, or using anecdotes, pursue some weird dogma. e.g. the "corgi clause"